UPDATE: How States Rank in Living-Donor Protections

Last year about this time I published a post about living donation-related protections and benefits, by state. As I mentioned then, while awaiting passage of a federal Living Donor Protection Act, more than half of states have enacted their own version (it’s now 31). In fact, like the one we’ve been supporting in North Carolina, some state bills are actually are more generous than the federal version (by including paid leave for state employees who donate).

United States Map With State Names Pdf Valid Printable Map Of | Printable Map Of The United States Pdf – Printable US Maps

But the LDPA is just one way that states can encourage living donation. Financial supports and job protections are other critical ones. I decided to check on the status of those efforts and the resources I provided last year–to include updates and new links as needed.

Are you considering being a living donor, or have you donated recently? Do you know what the relevant tax provisions and protections are in your state–or in a state you may be looking at? It’s worth doing your homework.

The National Kidney Foundation has a terrific resource in a map you can click on to find out what donation-related laws and protections a particular state offers. Does it have a Living Donor Protection Act, or similar insurance-discrimination protections? Does it also have job-protected living donor leave for private employees? How about for state employees? What about paid leave? What about tax deductions? Even better, what about tax credits?

The American Kidney Fund website also features an invaluable resource: a state report card. It rates each state based on important donation-related measures and provides an overall rating on how well that state encourages living donation and removes barriers. Though I’m happy to report there has been some progress in the past year, it’s not nearly enough. Not surprisingly, only a few states still merit an A: Arkansas, Connecticut, and Louisiana. Glad to see that 16 now get Bs, and 14 (plus Washington, DC) have Cs, but several get Ds (including, alas, North Carolina).

Unfortunately, seven states rate an F–that is, these states failed miserably because they have no donation-related measures in place: Alabama, Michigan, Montana, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Tennessee, and Vermont. Earlier this year Nevada and Wyoming passed anti-insurance discrimination laws, moving them up to a D; Rhode Island just passed its version in late June, moving it up to a C. That brings the national average grade to a C, up from D when AKF began the report card system in 2021.

The irony–and real tragedy–is that none of these donation measures is really controversial–they shouldn’t be so damn hard to pull off. They are simple, reasonable, common-sense ways that a state can demonstrate its support for people who help save a life in this way. In fact, not only does encouraging living donation save lives, for kidney patients it reduces costs by reducing the number of people on dialysis (Medicare pays about $90,000 a year per dialysis patient).

With 103,600 people in this country on the national transplant waiting list (about 4 out of 5 needing a kidney), it seems that the very least we can do is remove the barriers to living donation.

For related posts, resources, and information on The Insider’s Guide to Living Kidney Donation, be sure to explore the rest of my website.

Word of the Day: “Eplets”

As I wrote last week, I recently was very fortunate to attend two memorable donation-related events in New York City. Between the National Kidney Registry Awards Gala and the National Kidney Donation Organization‘s living kidney donation symposium, I heard fascinating research updates, applauded impressive awards and presentations by dedicated donation advocates, and learned so much.

I met and talked with people I admire and felt an immediate bond with. That held true from the first person I met when I sat down to breakfast at the NKDO symposium, held at the New York City Bar Association–a woman in a Kidney Donor Athletes tee shirt, who said she knew me from this website(!)–to the last person I met, after they’d closed the building and people were lingering outside: a donor/writer who started a nonprofit, Rock1Kidney, and was clearly moved when I talked about being at the Guinness Records gathering of living donors at the Bean.

It always takes time to digest all the new information and remarks, and invariably one or two strong takeaways emerge. This time it was a single word and dramatic new concept for me: eplets. They’re the key to what NKR calls the “Kidney for Life Initiative.”

It turns out that compatibility is way more nuanced than I ever imagined. You may have heard about HLA antigens (you know, the 6-out-of-6 match being the so-called “perfect match”?) . Well, apparently, “matching” antigens may look the same, but they differ by their eplet pattern (think of them as “immunologic hot spots”).

Fair warning: I am not a transplant surgeon, a scientist, or a medical writer, so please do not quote me on this. Rather, use the occasion to go ask someone who is–or, better yet, google Kidney for Life.

Dr. Dorry Segev, NYU Langone transplant surgeon (photo by Carol Offen)

I’d seen the word eplet on charts and even heard it referenced at the NKR Gala presentations. I got the basic gist from the context, but it wasn’t until Dorry Segev, transplant surgeon at NYU Langone, explained it so well at the symposium that I “got it.” From what I understand, it’s time that potential donors and transplant recipients started using the term, as in “Do you test for eplets?”

Yup, Dr. Segev says “everyone should ask” that before a donation/transplant, so be sure to add it to your list of questions. Not all transplant centers do the necessary “high-resolution typing” that can see how many eplets are in the antigens. The number of eplet mismatches can make the difference between a kidney transplant that starts to deteriorate months later, and leads to rejection, and one that can conceivably last “for life,” requiring a lower level of immunosuppressants.

Wow–what a potential game changer! Though “eplets” are new to me, and probably to you, they’re hardly new to transplant professionals, who have been studying this “latest generation in DNA sequencing technology” (per the NKR website) for years. Dr. Segev thinks that within about five years, we’ll all be talking about eplets. I know I will and I hope you will too.

For related posts, resources, and information on The Insider’s Guide to Living Kidney Donation, be sure to explore the rest of my website.

A Week to Celebrate!

Last week was quite a memorable one, jam-packed with kidney-donation milestones and special events.

First, on June 27, my husband, son/recipient Paul, and I marked kidneyversary no. 17 with our traditional celebratory dinner out (no, no special cakes–we save those for biggies like nos. 10 and 15).

Next, two days later found me in New York City at—of all places!—the Plaza. The occasion was the lavish National Kidney Registry Awards Gala honoring living donors, with a champagne reception followed by a delicious sit-down dinner in a gorgeous hotel ballroom.

I was one of more than a hundred living donors, plus donation professionals, attending from all over the country. One of the dedicated professionals I got to chat with was Cody Wooley, a very engaging donor coordinator from St. Louis University Nephrology Division. Cody was actually one of the professionals honored, and I was delighted to have my photo taken with her before she received the award.

NKR is the world’s largest paired-exchange (aka “kidney swap”) program. Founder/CEO Garet Hil (a living donor himself) started the nonprofit following his family’s desperate search for a matching kidney for his young daughter in 2007.

Since then NKR has facilitated more than 7,000 living donations.Its goal is to increase and improve living donation while removing all the disincentives to being a donor. Here are just a few of the “what ifs” that NKR has successfully addressed, largely through its Donor Shield protections:

… a family member later needs a kidney at some unknown date? Living donors can receive a voucher for their intended recipient to get a kidney months or even many years later.

… I can’t afford the lost wages and extra childcare costs while I’m recovering? Donor Shield reimburses donors up to $17,000 (up to $12,000 for lost wages and up to $5,000 for travel/lodging and dependent care costs).

—I need a kidney transplant myself one day? Living donors through NKR have priority for a living kidney should they ever need one. (Note: Of the 7,000-plus living donations it’s facilitated, NKR has never had a donor need one.)

In addition to the dinner and the impressive stats, the evening included dramatic video presentations on (and talks by) super-athlete living donors who have done multiple marathons, ultramarathons, and summit climbs. The memorable takeaway, of course, is that donating a kidney does not mean a change in an active lifestyle. Full disclosure: most living donors are more like you or me (a healthy daily walker/zumba fan) than an ultramarathoner–but the point is that those who were runners or swimmers or whatever before donation can certainly continue to exercise their passion (other than contact sports) with just one kidney.

Then, on June 30, I attended the National Kidney Donation Organization‘s living donation symposium. There I learned so much exciting new information about kidney transplants that I’ll cover it in a separate post. Stay tuned!

For related posts, resources, and information on The Insider’s Guide to Living Kidney Donation, be sure to explore the rest of my website.