Mr. Smith–uh, Ms. Offen–Goes to Washington!

If you’ve been following this blog for awhile, you know that I’ve had many many meetings “on Capitol Hill” as a kidney advocate. Productive days filled with back-to-back meetings with legislative staffers, even some members of Congress–as part of the National Kidney Foundation’s Kidney Patient Summit and the American Society for Nephrology-led Community Advocacy Day. Every single one of them, alas, has been on zoom or the equivalent.

It all began for me when NKF accepted me as an advocate in fall 2019. I was thrilled to be invited to participate in the upcoming summit on Capitol Hill in March 2020. I had my plane tickets, my hotel reservation, and my fundraising page. As the date approached, I got more excited–and then…well, that’s of course when the world turned upside down. The Summit was cancelled just a few weeks before it was supposed to happen. I took part in the virtual summit held that fall, and they then scheduled an in-person one for March. That too was cancelled.

Fast forward to 2023. Once again I’ve been invited. I’m even going to be the group leader this time for our foursome from North Carolina. My bags are packed and I have my tickets plus a few new touches: a CLEAR app on my phone to show proof of vaccination and negative covid test. I’m chomping at the bit. (Of course, I’m nervous, too, worrying about going from office A to office B without getting delayed or lost.)

Interestingly, I’m not that uptight about the meetings themselves because I learned a long time ago that it’s the personal stories that matter most. As NKF’s Lauren Drew always points out, staffers and members of Congress sit in meeting after meeting with paid lobbyists and hear facts and statistics all day long. What will stay with them at the end of the day is not the numbers but the personal, emotional stories.

Staffers and lawmakers may not remember the fact that 37 million Americans have chronic kidney disease and the vast majority don’t know it yet. But when they meet a woman whose life was forever changed when her diabetes spiraled out of control and led to kidney failure–and hear her tearfully describe the long years of waiting for “the call” that a kidney is available–that they’ll remember.

Will they remember how many transplants were performed last year with living donors versus deceased donors? Probably not, but when they meet a healthy living donor who was repeatedly turned down or overcharged for life insurance just because of being a donor–that is, discriminated against for stepping up to save a life–suddenly supporting the Living Donor Protection Act–a noncontroversial, bipartisan effort–should become a no-brainer.

They may think that dialysis is a conveniently available option for everyone until they hear from someone who had to take two buses and spend 2 hours each way to get to the nearest center. Maybe that will help persuade them to support the Home Dialysis Act to expand access to and support for home dialysis for those patients–particularly in rural areas–who want it.

Will they remember how much federal funding goes toward kidney disease research? Perhaps not, but when they’re told unequivocally that investments in research and early detection will save Medicare millions of dollars down the road, they just might consider increasing appropriations.

For related posts, resources, and information on The Insider’s Guide to Living Kidney Donation, be sure to explore the rest of my website.

Happy to Pay It Forward

Recently, I was excited to receive a very happy update to a long, frustrating quest for a kidney. Stormi Murtie, a North Carolina woman who had contacted me last year when she learned of our book, had been tirelessly trying to get a kidney for a loved one to whom she could not donate. She’s now getting ready to pay it forward by sharing her healthy spare kidney with someone else. I thought reading her moving story might give hope to anyone who has ever despaired of getting “the call.” (I took the liberty of adding emphasis to a few passages that seem particularly important or instructive.)

Stormi writes:

Two years ago my then 32 year old firefighter step-son Brecon contracted a very rare life threatening condition called Goodpasture Syndrome. It did not kill him, but it killed his kidneys. Left in total renal failure, his new normal was 4 hour dialysis sessions 3x’s per week. His body could not tolerate home hemodialysis, so after his work day ended he would spend hours at the dialysis center. It was exhausting. With us in NC and Brecon in FL my husband made countless trips back and forth and we learned everything we could about renal failure, antibodies, point systems, hospital protocols, kidney transplants–and living kidney donors. From books, articles, organizations, we poured over every snippet of info we could. The process can be extremely complicated, and feels frustratingly slow.

We learned that much of the info we received was from a pre-Covid system and did not apply. The medical community had changed and with it many of the systems previously in place were stretched very thin or no longer applicable to our situation. I came to understand the incredible need for living donors of all ages, and I was committed to being healthy enough to be approved.

Slow motion forward to August 2022: after extensive medical appointments, a new lifestyle, testing at Shands in Gainesville, and 25 lbs lighter, I was approved to be a donor in a “paired donor exchange” program.

A clearly happy Stormi and her undeniably healthy-looking stepson, Brecon, after his transplant.

While waiting for the computer to uncover any viable options, Brecon was also on the waiting list at 2 Florida hospitals for a deceased donor kidney, and multiple friends and family were being tested to see if they were a match. Wherever a viable kidney could be located first, we were casting as wide a net as possible. Since he was highly sensitized, finding a match was very difficult. Suddenly and unbelievably, after many false starts, on November 7, 2022 Brecon received that call. And after waiting all day for a thumbs up or down, he received a kidney from a selfless family of a deceased donor. He is currently doing well and we are so hopeful he continues to thrive with his new kidney. After two years, the very first trip Brecon was able to make was to us.   

Now:  It is time for me to pay it forward. Details are still in flux but I have also received the call that a chain donation is on the table. With me as the altruistic first cog in a chain of donations, three wonderful people are in queue to finally receive their transplants (nationwide, over 93,000 are on the kidney transplant waiting list).

One day soon, multiple surgeons, donors and recipients will converge in Gainesville, and like a fine-tuned performance, an intricate ballet of donors and recipients, following multiple operations, lives will be changed. I am honored to be able to donate my kidney to help a stranger in need, to ultimately pay it forward just like the selfless donor family did for Brecon.  

For related posts, resources, and information on my new book, The Insider’s Guide to Living Kidney Donation, be sure to explore the rest of my website.

New Year’s Resolutions

True, new year’s resolutions tend to fall by the wayside after a few months for most people, but we keep making them anyway. Maybe this year will be different. I looked at the resolutions I posted last year at this time and they’re still good, so please give them a try. Whether you have one kidney or two, they can help keep you and your (potential) transplant recipient healthy. Here’s to a happy, healthy, and peaceful new year!

Photo by Mikhail Nilov on Pexels.com

For related posts, resources, and information on my book, The Insider’s Guide to Living Kidney Donation,

please be sure to explore the rest of my website.

Good News and Bad News

If you’re anything like me, you’ll want to read the bad news first. (I’ve never understood why anyone would want to hear good news first, feel terrific, only to then be brought back down and left with sad or depressing news.)

Photo by Miguel u00c1. Padriu00f1u00e1n on Pexels.com
Photo by Tim Mossholder on Pexels.com

So, first the bad news:

The Living Donor Protection Act, which was first introduced in 2014, still hasn’t crossed the finish line on its way to becoming law. It would provide basic protections against discrimination by insurance companies, as well as job protections for taking time off work to donate. Remember the latest big push during the meetings with lawmakers we had in the fall? We were SO close to finally getting this thing passed. I’m not sure if it’s still technically possible, but it’s as good as impossible. That means we start all over in the next session of Congress. We”ll also need a new House sponsor because Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler wasn’t reelected.

Now the good news!

Even though it didn’t make it into law, the LDPA had the most cosponsors ever: 158 in the House and 43 in the Senate. That has to translate into increased bipartisan support in the next Congress. In other words, we shouldn’t need to start from scratch. They all know about the act now, and, given that nearly 100,000 people in this country are waiting for a lifesaving kidney, most lawmakers understand its importance.

$$$ for Kidney Disease Awareness and More: Congress just released its final appropriations bill that includes substantial increases in funding for federal programs that promote kidney disease awareness, education, and research. Sure, we need more living donors and must remove obstacles to donation, and yes we need an implantable artificial kidney, but ultimately the best way to meet the critical need for kidneys and save lives by reducing kidney failure, is to PREVENT chronic kidney disease in the first place. So, education and research are absolutely essential.

The Immuno Drug Bill (aka Comprehensive Immunosuppressive Drug Coverage for Kidney Transplant Patients Act), which finally passed at the end of 2020, goes into effect very soon: January 1, 2023. Believe it or not, this one had been kicking around way longer than the LDPA: 20 years! The kidney community has been fighting to change the law that arbitrarily cuts off Medicare coverage for transplant recipients who don’t otherwise qualify for it–for example, those under 65– after 36 months post transplant. The Immuno bill now ensures that people with no other health plan to pay for their critical antirejection meds will be able to have these drugs covered for the life of the transplant.

Eligible individuals can start applying for the Medicare immuno drug coverage right now. If you have questions, contact the toll-free help line at 855.NKF.CARES (855.653.2273) or nkfcares@kidney.org .

For related posts, resources, and information on my book, The Insider’s Guide to Living Kidney Donation,

please be sure to explore the rest of my website.

Why Is Living Donation So Important?

According to polls, the vast majority (90%) of Americans favor organ donation after death–yet, only about 60% are registered to be organ or tissue donors.

Just curious, what percentage of people in the United States would you guess die in such a way that traditional organ donation is possible? A third? A fifth? Not even close! Less than 1 percent: typically, in a hospital following an accident. So, no, not at home in their beds, not on impact in a car crash, often not even after a slow death from myriad diseases.

That little heart on your driver’s license is just one way to make it known that you want to be a donor. It takes just a minute to register online at many sites.

Traditional organ donation 101: When a dying person has been determined to be brain dead—no activity, no chance of survival—but the heart is still beating, blood is flowing to their internal organs. Once the organ has been removed from the blood supply, the sooner it’s placed in the recipient’s body, the better. With luck it’s off the blood supply for only a few minutes or hours. When it’s necessary to put it on an airplane, that interruption may last several hours—technically, 24 to 36 hours is acceptable, but the sooner it can be hooked up to the recipient’s veins, the better.

So most of the 100,000 people on the national waiting lists may languish several years–5 to 10 is not uncommon–before they receive a lifesaving organ (most of them are waiting for a kidney), and thousands don’t get one in time. Clearly, we need more people to be registered donors.

So, absolutely, register to be an organ and tissue donor (organdonor.gov is one of many sites where you can register in just a couple of minutes), and tell your family of your desire (and then urge them to do the same). But even if everyone complied, we’d still have an organ shortage because of that 99% that can’t be used in traditional donation.

That’s where live donation comes in. Not only does it add to the pool and shorten the wait, it even improves the outcome for most transplant recipients. And we need to remove obstacles for potential donors so that more people will consider being living donors. Tell your representatives–in your state and nationally–to support the Living Donor Protection Act and to increase funds for financial assistance for living donors and for early detection of chronic kidney disease.

An important health crisis as urgent and daunting as an organ shortage deserves more attention, more funding, and a meaningful commitment to finding creative solutions.

For related posts, resources, and information on my new book, The Insider’s Guide to Living Kidney Donation, be sure to explore the rest of my website.

Still Advocating After All These Years

Last week I had a day of back-to-back virtual meetings with congressional staffers–plus one congressman!–to talk about the Living Donor Protection Act and kidney health in general. Hard for me to believe that this was my fifth such event. Unlike most of the others I’ve been a part of, this one represented a partnership of 22 kidney-health organizations–including the National Kidney Foundation, of course–led by the American Society of Nephrology.

The good news: The LDPA is closer to being passed than at any time since it was first introduced in 2014.

The bad news: With Congress adjourning soon, if it doesn’t make it across the finish line now, we’ll have to start all over in the next session of Congress. (That thought is not only depressing but overwhelming because of logistical issues that I’ll save for another post.) Consequently, our “ask” was not just for cosponsorship of the bill by those members who hadn’t yet signed on but for help from all of them to get the bill to the floor.

As I related here after one such day of meetings, I’ve come to understand what the trainers have told us repeatedly: it’s the personal stories that will stay with and move a staffer or member of Congress. They’ve had a gazillion meetings and heard all the appalling numbers before: that nearly 100,000 Americans are waiting for a kidney and at least 13 die every day because they didn’t get one in time. They know all that on an intellectual level. It’s not the same as hearing what it means for a mother to see her son grow more and more listless and depressed as he struggles through long months of dialysis.

I was joined by an impressive group of fellow advocates who represented an interesting range of perspectives: Brenda Johnson, from the Veterans Transplantation Association, who told of veterans struggling with kidney failure or having to fight with insurance companies to get life insurance if they donate; Lauren Drew, NKF’s very savvy governmental affairs director, who’s been my mentor for such meetings since I first became a Kidney Advocacy Committee member; Dr. Hostensia Beng, a pediatric nephrologist, who shared heartbreaking stories of parents trying desperately to find a kidney donor for their young child; and Dr. Gentzon Hall, a nephrologist/genetics researcher at Duke Medical Center (just down the road from me), whom I’d met last year when we were on the same advocacy team. He emphasized the dire need for more research funding.

The highlight of the day had to be our meeting with Rep. Gregory Murphy, a former transplant surgeon. He knows firsthand how transplant transforms lives, and he promised not only to cosponsor the Living Donor Protection Act but to do all he could to help move it across the finish line before Congress adjourns.

It’s soo close. C’mon, LDPA!

For related posts and information on my new book, The Insider’s Guide to Living Kidney Donation, be sure to explore the rest of my website.

Contributor Spotlight: Workplace Friends as Donors

Many people assume that you have to be a blood relative to donate your kidney to someone. And in the early decades of living donation, that was pretty much the case. Family members are still the largest single group of living donors, but the percentage of unrelated donors has been growing. This contributor spotlight highlights two of our book’s contributors who learned firsthand that a donor might actually be someone you know from work. (Afterward they often do feel like family.)

One of our contributors–Linda Watson–chose to donate to a colleague friend (my co-author, Betsy!). Another, Joe Reichle, instead received his kidney from a former student’s spouse.

Linda Watson and husband, Joel, on the Georgetown waterfront in Washington, DC

Linda had worked with Betsy for years before she learned how serious her friend’s health problems were. Still, as Linda relates in her chapter, like many people back in 2003 she didn’t realize that she herself could possibly be eligible to donate. But when she saw several other colleagues step up to be tested, she knew that this was what she wanted to do.

Linda explains that her decision also coincided with a time in her life when she very much needed to “do something life affirming.”

Receiving Linda’s kidney enabled Betsy to get off dialysis; produce urine once again (“I never thought I’d get so emotional about seeing a bag of urine,” Linda writes, describing her first visit to Betsy’s hospital room); and return to her position at the university full time. (About 17 years later Betsy would need another transplant–while our book was in production, in fact. Happily, she’s back to working full time again.)

Today Linda, who is in phased retirement from her work in speech and hearing sciences, clearly leads a full life. Besides gardening; traveling with her husband, Joel, albeit limited by COVID; singing in the choir and participating in other activities at her church, she recently tried her hand at voice lessons. She looks forward to traveling more extensively as the pandemic eases.

Joe Reichle has polycystic kidney disease, like many in his family, several of whom died relatively young. He begins his chapter by explaining that as a young man, he’d always figured that that would be his fate too. Instead, Joe, a retired university professor in the Midwest, led a normal adult life for 30+ years before the word transplant ever surfaced.

When Joe learned that the wait for a deceased donor kidney could be five years, he considered a live-kidney transplant in the hope of getting a kidney before he needed dialysis: a preemptive transplant. Knowing too that a living donation typically has a better outcome, he reluctantly let it be known that he needed a transplant (“I’m a person who doesn’t like to ask for things”). Joe relates in his chapter how surprised and moved he was to see colleagues and former colleagues seek him out, wanting to donate to him.

Many would-be donors were eliminated, and when a former student volunteered but later became pregnant, her husband fortunately volunteered to donate in her stead. Since his transplant, Joe says, despite other health issues, “for the most part, my health has been very good.”

He and his wife enjoy a comparatively quiet life in northwestern Michigan on East Grand Traverse Bay, where they enjoy photographing the wildlife, which includes bald eagles, red foxes, deer, chipmunks, raccoons, and the occasional bobcat.

They are less sedentary, he says, since the arrival of a lively two-year-old weimaraner-lab mix, named Rosie, who enjoys the water. Joe also still “dabbles” in intervention research for children with communication delays.

Even though Joe’s donor, Robert Drager, and family live far away in Pennsylvania, the two families often shared special occasions in the first several years and have stayed in touch.

Nearly 20 years post transplant, Joe has some words of advice to anyone considering a transplant, which he calls “one of the best decisions that I have made. Your quality of life will be significantly enhanced,” he says. And, as for your family, “they will spend less time worrying about you.”

We think those are both awfully good reasons.

For related posts and information on my new book, The Insider’s Guide to Living Kidney Donation, be sure to explore the rest of my website.

Donors Don’t Get Paid, But the Rewards Are Still Real

Every once in a while, I mindlessly scroll through my website stats to see how a particular blog post or month of posts fared. I was curious when I noticed “Best Views Ever” (in more than three years): November 28, 2020. Hmm, what might that have been, I wondered. Naturally, I had to check it out.

I was delighted–and honestly, not too surprised–to see the title: “Kidney Donors Don’t Get Paid, But the Rewards Are Very Real.” I remember that a lot of living donors told me they’d read it while nodding in agreement, and many people pointed out that even though these things were pretty obvious to donors, transplant centers usually don’t give them enough weight. I just reread the post to see how it holds up nearly two years later. I can defend every word, so I’ve decided to reprint it here (rather than link to it) so it will have today’s date–and not be limited to kidney donors:

**********************************************

In previous posts, I’ve described some of the enormous benefits of a live vs. deceased-donor kidney transplant for the recipient, but did you know that there are many very real benefits to the living donor, too? For family members or couples, the benefits are nothing short of dramatic. And I’m not just talking about feel-good points.

Photo by Pixabay on Pexels.com

For a family, the practical benefits can be as concrete as money in the bank. A spouse or parent whose ability to work was limited by dialysis for a long period may gradually be able to resume a full-time schedule–maybe even launch a new career. That can substantially improve the family’s ailing financial health as well.

For family caregivers, particularly, donating a kidney to the loved one you’ve been caring for can bring huge relief. The reduced stress and no doubt improved sleep can have considerable benefits in energy, mood, overall outlook, and, as a result, even job satisfaction.

Then there’s the extraordinary motivation of saving a loved one’s life or turning it around. A living donor I know who’d donated to her husband described her decision as “purely selfish. I wasn’t about to lose him,” she insisted. I know the feeling.

Seeing someone you love–in my case, my adult son–who’d been pale, weak, and listless for months or years gradually become their old self again is pretty powerful. And a donor whose partner wasn’t interested in intimacy during a long period of ill health may see a positive change in their relationship.

Want to improve your social life? Give your partner a kidney! Couples who have been uncomfortable for a long time about socializing—whether because of physical obstacles or simply due to the dialysis patient’s lack of energy or interest—may soon be able to enjoy evenings out with friends or family.

For anyone who donates a kidney—even to someone they don’t know—the benefits are nearly universal:

The feeling of personal gratification is indescribable. Knowing that you’ve helped give someone—anyone—a shot at a healthy, productive life—is an extraordinary feeling. Living donors in studies report a boost in self-esteem, and 9 out of 10 say they would do it again. Through donor-support groups I’m active in on Facebook, I’ve been struck by how life changing the experience has felt for most of us, including the few who have later had complications or whose recipient didn’t fare well for as long as expected.

A fascinating journal article inspired this post. The researchers argue that for the above reasons and more, transplant centers considering a potential donor’s relative risk might do well to acknowledge and give weight to the undeniable tangible benefits for certain donors.

“Van Pilsum Rasmussen, S. E., M. Henderson, J. Kahn, and D. Segev. “Considering Tangible Benefit for Interdependent Donors: Extending a Risk–Benefit Framework in Donor Selection.” American Journal of Transplantation 17, no. 10 (Oct. 2017): 2567-2571.

For related posts and information on my new book, The Insider’s Guide to Living Kidney Donation, be sure to explore the rest of my website.

How’s Your State Doing on Donor Protection Measures?

In my last post I promised information about living donation-related protections and benefits, by state. As I mentioned, while awaiting passage of a federal Living Donor Protection Act, more than half of states now have their own version (28 at last count). In fact, like the one we’re supporting in North Carolina, some actually are more generous than the federal version (by including paid leave for state employees who donate).

United States Map With State Names Pdf Valid Printable Map Of | Printable Map Of The United States Pdf – Printable US Maps

But the LDPA is just one way that states can encourage living donation. Financial supports and job protections are other critical ones. Are you considering being a living donor, or have you donated recently? Do you know what the relevant tax provisions and protections are in your state–or in a state you may be looking at? It’s worth doing your homework.

The National Kidney Foundation has a terrific resource in a map you can click on to find out what donation-related laws and protections a particular state offers. Does it have a Living Donor Protection Act, or similar insurance-discrimination protections? Does it also have job-protected living donor leave for private employees? How about for state employees? What about paid leave? What about tax deductions? Even better, what about tax credits?

The American Kidney Fund website also features an invaluable resource: a state report card. It rates each state based on important donation-related measures and provides an overall rating on how well that state encourages living donation and removes barriers. Not surprisingly, only a few states merit an A: Arkansas, Connecticut, and Louisiana. Glad to see that more than a dozen at least get Bs, but nearly as many have Cs, a few get Ds (including, alas, North Carolina).

Unfortunately, nine states rate an F–that is, these states failed miserably because they have no donation-related measures in place: Alabama, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, South Dakota, Tennessee, Vermont, and Wyoming.

The tragedy is that none of these donation measures is really controversial–they shouldn’t be so damn hard to pull off. They are simple, reasonable, common sense ways that a state can demonstrate its support for people who help save a life in this way. In fact, not only does encouraging living donation save lives, for kidney patients it reduces costs by reducing the number of people on dialysis (Medicare pays about $90,000 a year per dialysis patient).

With 106,000 people in this country on the national transplant waiting list (most of them needing a kidney), it seems that the very least we can do is remove the barriers to living donation.

For related posts and information on my new book, The Insider’s Guide to Living Kidney Donation, be sure to explore the rest of my website.

NC’s Living Donor Protection Act Back to Square 1

Everyone seemed to think the bill was oh-so-close to passing this session. And, personally, I was honored–and very excited–to be one of three local advocates invited to the National Kidney Foundation’s planned legislative breakfast with a few supportive state representatives. NKF wanted us to share our personal views of why the state needs to protect living donors. The breakfast had already been scheduled and rescheduled months in advance.

This state bill had been in the works for a few years (admittedly not nearly as long as the federal version, which dates back to 2014). In an effort to remove disincentives to donation, the legislation was designed to ensure that donors could not be refused or overcharged for insurance, among other protections. Tired of waiting for a federal Living Donor Protection Act, more and more states (now 28) have passed their own LDPAs.

The NC bill had strong sponsors in the House and Senate, and we were looking for more cosponsors. But after several delays, last month we got word that the bill would not be taken up during this short legislative session. Better luck next year.

Just before the pandemic, in January 2020 I went to our state capital as part of another small NKF delegation to tell my story to legislators as we searched for sponsors. Since then the bill has gradually made its way through the Health and Finance committees, and, finally, Insurance. When I was asked to submit testimony to the Finance Committee, I related my experience as a living donor, describing what a “best-case scenario” looks like.

We thought for sure this time the bill would succeed. Alas, by not being considered during this session, the bill will go back to square one when it’s reintroduced next year. Again, we’ll be looking for more cosponsors.

Photo by Edwin Jaulani on Pexels.com

Whatever else you can say about sausage making–it sure is slow. In an upcoming post, I’ll provide current information on state laws and benefits for living donors.

For related posts and information on my new book, The Insider’s Guide to Living Kidney Donation, be sure to explore the rest of my website.